• I co-authored the Lord of Ring as the Persuasion. We used to have a male bachelor student No.1 ‘Once upon A Time’ who became a pop star by the song ‘Oh, Carol’, then a male bachelor student No.2 who lived under Queens’ Reign, became a poet by the poem ‘When you are Old’, as well to his sweetheart, who always waited for her ‘Godat’, and then a male bachelor male student No.3, born into the Golden Hall, became instead a Waltz dancer, forever pairing partners. Later students just said I am a messer.

  • 9/9/2025 on Teacher’s Day, I went to watch the movie with others in the college auditorium. I watched the movie nearly 20 years ago and had been deeply touched. Yesterday, upon watching the opening part, I could not help crying already.

  • Quoted from Hinton from his 2024 Nobel Banquet speech accessible freely on Youtube : ‘it is not just SCI-FI anymore’. Frankly speaking, I myself as an amateur lover in language and literature, upon hearing the conclusive remark, had felt a bit challenged to challenge the sounded as if a challenging statement. I have my reasons that make sense by straightforward logic : SCI-FI is not an even a properly studied or practiced literature kindred by literature advanced degree holders.

    Somehow, after writing the above exposition, I had also agreed that Hinton’s remark completely makes sense. And it has considered social aspects of human community as well.  The remark could rather be considered as a posture of remorse than challenge.

    Owing many thanks to Markov process, I now stand on the incidental timestamp to move further by raising the below topics of future research:

    a). Can Quantum Speed-up generate wider range of instances that contribute to their pre-defined enclosed set such that social communication incidents/accidents under given circumstances can be predicted? If so, accidents can be avoided whilst incidents can be well-prepared.

    b). Is the future of Digital Communication Quantum Communication? Technically from digital computer to quantum computer, scientists and technologists have managed to work out through different interpretations of quantum physics across the relatively long time span. The facts that their works had not become a research or commercial success no more matter for now because they all have served as proof of the on-going steady and strong scientific progress and contributed to the current state of art research development Quantum Technology. To the question above, the writer considers the answer is Yes. Justification comes as follows : the gist of digital communication is electrons and diode whilst the gist of quantum communication strictly speaking, in contradiction to the currently promoted in mainstream the optical photonic communication, in the writer’s opinion, should be the composites of the nuclei core model instead. The latter serves to be a more profound scientific breakthrough whilst the former contributes to stabilize a more significant development of social wealth. The writer would henceforth ignore the former and leave it to be observed for later financial indicators in economy regime.  The development of the latter will definitely boost the computing power of man-made devices. That in turn will approximate countable infinite as much as to in-countable infinite.

    The emergence of Siri and ChatGPT have well demonstrated the computing power of digital computers to capture a variety of human voice waveforms and generalize them statistically into scripting language as inputs and outputs as well, whilst the becoming of quantum computers with its larger throngs of particle movement in the tube probably can not only convert general human voices into conventional scripting language on computer screens but as well achieve personalized service based on individual voice attributes without keyboard typed in account information that linked to web.

    c).What is the prospect of future communication?  As being discussed from the beginning of the notes, esp. considering the social resource distribution favoring STEM ever since, the writer confirm her standpoint that the future communication either via contents or via technology still goes to (Quantum) Physics

  • Communication is a life maintenance necessity skill. The applicant suspects COMMUNICATION the word originated from COMMUNAL + CABLE + TION. Literally it means COMMUNICATION is a capability for man to acquire in order to stay in COMMUNAL. COMMUNAL is approximate in form to the word COMMUNITY  where human social takes place and man’s society is being formed. Via this interpretation of the word, readers can acknowledge COMMUNICATION consists of LANGUAGE with the latter as one of the accessible ingredients in working out the sensational ‘cuisine’ of COMMUNICATION.

    Communication is developed by self-adapting to environs. Human being as an individual via in-born adaptability thanks to self-survivable energy level takes in actuating information from the outer world, digests the information and outputs the processed to the outer world. By Cartesian Coordinates, along timeline, the outer world in relative to the static human self being evolves and across the 2-D geo-coordinated plane, the outer world changes with the movement of the human self being. The information digested from environs at the previous moment by man can impact only to the environs where the man outputs the next moment. By the statement, the writer ends to treat the man himself as black box of information intelligent relay node in software test. Using the term ‘relay’, the writer tends to pinpoint man’s both information input and output functionalities.

    Man’s acknowledgement of himself till current research literature has been outpaced by man’s innovation of the physical tools that he could utilize to relax himself. It is a  bit of dilemma – in order to relax man from onerous daily labor of living, he can spend a lot (even by investment whose running principle is based on spending future) to make tools to ease or just to replace him in house chores, in grocery shopping, in field-trudging, in office desk-work, etc. It is not an equal transaction with huge expenses and minute returns.

    Even worse is the phenomena especially noticeable in education sector worldwide STEM subjects recruit the best talents in the system and prepare the most strikingly impactful workforce later to the society. Due the fact that resources are limited, simply put there is just one Earth though many planets, non-STEM subjects (man’s knowledge in himself) are outpaced by STEM subjects as time has gone by.

    Somehow, non-STEM subjects are as well producing incumbent workforce into societies that play major parts in social policy issuing, international relationship dealing, demo vs. dic. governmental level debating, etc. They are greatly influencing the MASS somehow with no better quality or credential that could match up to their peers in STEMs. It doesn’t mean that these set of people are lagging behind. Just as what I had mentioned in the previous paragraph, MASS matters. It only means that their counter-set of people would be constrained even cluelessly. Cluelessness consists into a vital menace to STEM set simply because due to years of training, schooling and educating, logic, reason and sense has been most critical and derivation has been the gist for STEM set already.  The damage has been fatal and will continue being.

    And according to (in fact) outdated classic economy theory that is still in use nowadays due to the stagnancy of economy theory development, current world social rule via policy media level still employs the bipolar (either West-Capital-Free or East-Rural-Plan) research or implementation methodology, the scale of social resource would still slant over towards STEM. It is not because economy policy makers themselves are not aware and are not making change to scale back the weight towards non-STEM (for instance), it is just because social science deals completely with society. Mass matters even more for economy policy makers. To enlighten MASS, back to my previous statement above, elite education should be discouraged. Only via mass, can government implement out the policies swiftly and thoroughly.

    As what has been stated in the previous paragraph, reverse of the situation is not possible. The arrival of AI further proves that. The becoming of AI is expected, but the fast growth of AI is unexpected. Somehow, it is the reality unavoidable only to be faced by human society as a whole.  One of the powerfully impactful products of AI is ChatGPT kindred. Natural Language Processing in the phase before AI had laid a very solid and social aware foundation for ChatGPT kindred. The writer’s father has been using Deepseek (Chinese version of ChatGPT) in order to catch up with latest technology development and avoid being lagging behind by digital societies as a non-STEM, esp. while living with his daughter a typical STEM together simply just to ease out his anxieties.

    Can AI-assisted communication become AI communication and replace human communication at all? My answer is Yes. It is a race between Machine and Man. Man has arrived to a new epoch. Tomorrow is another day, though brand new another day.

  • Elder generations had then envisioned the human society nowadays to be on digital. Then younger people of this generation seem on the contrast to their predecessors to have run out of the beautiful imagination of mankind stories. It is a very good topic to raise ‘What is post-digital’? According to the typical bipolar mechanism of digital system – [0,1],  from non-digital to digital, it is a leap from nothing to everything. Hence, would the post-digital simply be from digital to non-digital? A reverse procedure of the previous social development procedure as from everything to nothing (again)? I consider the answer is Yes.

    To elaborate the short answer further, I am going to explain from both technical point’s view and social scientifical point’s view and if needed, I will integrate both argument streams together for efficient communication.

    a). Technical aspect:  Current electronic -devices along their evolution paths, owing to the underlying design philosophy that Technology should ease Human Life, have arrived to their regime of AI power already. The ideas of smart home, etc have quite demonstrated human pursuits of extremity in every aspect of life exploration of possibilities that include how to relax themselves from undesired labour. For one instance, if the previous phase of e-devices still asked the favor of their owners’ manual movement for them to be switched ON and OFF [0,1], then current phase of e-devices have endeavored further to avoid even bothering their owners’ efforts as much as possible and that’s exactly ‘to your wish, your majesty’.  In the former case, man still needs to make efforts to decide whilst in the latter, the efforts have been minimized as much as possible already. It is a change of the bipolar mode of [0,1] to [0] – an accumulated social and technical development of mankind that leads to a new epoch. A new epoch doesn’t mean PLUS and PLUS instead it means to start from a completely new scratch again simply because there arrives new problems to the ever changing human societies.

    b)  Social aspect: The statement that human society is forever on the track of development optimistically towards the future is not correct. Keeping an above-low energy to sustain on the earth might work better instead of the former. Being a man either in social or in wild, man and others are inseparable. Mass matters. I consider elite education seems to be malfunctional and poses a surviving menace to mankind and his society. From this point’s view, education should shed in light through everyone’ opened window. To blame on human own traits (selfish, greedy, etc) only reflects back the reality that education has not been capably tolerating enough to be run to public. Further-more to blame on educational or professional institution’s mishandling in managing people invites in unnecessary and another new round of capital wasted on the subject of people management, esp. in current digital age.  Though, after-digital, there comes non-digital, it is not a return to  digital’s origin given a windowed timeframe. Instead it is a continued progress along the forever stretching timeline into completely unknown infinite.  Given the writer’s shallow knowledge in education on the global context, management the subject in higher education belongs to social science, which had been less invested by capital (human and non-human) for timespan that could have significantly slowed down the pace of the subject to head up with those subjects invested heavily by society, such as Computer Science, Finance, etc. A make-up investment is not going to make the balance sheet turn green again simply because time never waits. With time, things happened, happen and continue happening.

    That said, current wars, battles, conflicts and arguments occurred for reasons that existed before the timing of these incidents and await generations that live after the incidents to trace back and dig out.  The situation will be very harsh for younger generation if current generation were incapable to progress towards optimality meanwhile settle the permissiveness of disputes passed down by their own elder generations.

    This year of 2025 has been almost 100 years away from world war already. 100 years make up for three generations within a family household or even close to four generations. In Chinese modern literature, there had a book named ‘Four Generations within a Hall’ (四世同堂). But it is a very sad story, a typical style of modern mandarin novel writing that echoed the four seasons within a year along time – from flower blossoming wild of spring to snow blanketed earth of winter. The novel tells how a household prospers and decays. The writing style and contents have nothing to do with the attributes of the author himself simply because the novel became a huge success in the society. A novel’s success by mass has far more less relating to the author’s own background etc instead more relating to the author’s writing skills and mastery of the written words to his social contexts.

    From this perspective, mankind as being pushed by the tides of time, has indeed arrived to the new epoch whereas clerks of our old story telling are gone and new story telling are emerging via currently new technology platforms. It is from bipolar to singular – a singularity from a completely new dimension – from everything fulfilled to brand new nothing again.

  • First of all, the question statement itself has flaws. Hypothesis of something can not be in the place of realization of something. Given currently at least engineering sole research activities, prediction/theorem needs to be validated by experiments (from simulation to emulation to prototyping to on-site tests to large scale implementation). It probably means that hypothesis of how an existing quantum processor is being made needs the quantum processor manufacturer to reveal its core hardware processor infrastructure (made-up) details , which in economy market of quantum competition, is very business core confidential. That said, it is highly impossible or in a pragmatic term, just infeasible.

    Second of all, I will justify the CAN the issue. I would not endeavor to details on technical CAN but instead pointed out here that similar cases happened before and it will happen again . One of the similar cases that occurred recently is Huawei-Cisco copyright infringement issue. From Cisco’s research and technology production to the leakage of its product manufacturing manual to Huawei – the incident happened. It happened because management procedure (for one instance) and commerce and immigration policies (for other instances) on a general and grand level have existed to let it happen.

    There is not a term of reverse engineering not to mention the term of reversing time. Our next generations might be living in our previous generations’ lives, thanks to our own contemporary times’ idees and labour that contribute to future world. But we ourselves could not/would not live again life from infancy cradles to aged deathbeds. Time can not be reversed.

    That said above, regarding Huawei-Cisco the issue, if something happened, for either its negative or positive impacts or effects, all the efforts by men on the venue themselves to make it happen again or stop it happen in the future in the posterior phase should be a wrong plan-out and if ever implemented, will just twist the human built-up work and social logic acquired since.

    So if the outer laws of the human society let it happen. It happens for reasons and reasons make sense. Not a single man of flesh and bones is able to revert it. For those who ever try, they could be probably labeled as ‘anti-social (science)’.

    Then till now, I would state again that Quantum Processor the competition will follow the footstep pattern of that of Communication Network Switchboards as to be witnessed by time.

    Finally, I would arrive further to the conclusion that CAUSALITY the research topic depending on being populated by which ethnic group of mankind, had/has/will have stimulated different schools of comprehension and perception and if audacious enough, a work-out plan into life itself.

  • Quantum Tunnelling the term is relatively new. We have a definition via language alphabetical linear sorted presentable form as below :

    It is a signal to publicly indicate the change of economy policy that founded the old political system and succeeded the old school of philosophy. There exists no more ups and downs in life or opponents and friends in people or infinite negative and infinite positive in abstract thinking. Because from Gaussian Distribution (the most conventional probability distribution used in STEM field), the large number matters utterly important. In economy, middle-class consists into a majority of the society via resources de variety. It as well converges with the earth model (fatty belt area with sharp head and toe). And it is easily for the fatty betty area to flip over between head and toe. Moreover, it further converges with the [0,1] digital computer epoch – the flipping between [0,1] ou [1,0].

    The setting and configuration of [human story | certain time] from the beginning must be a bit faulty itself.

    I personally would not opt for beauty business by prizing economy. But unfortunately, that had existed since (given a timestamp) and impacted to make into current situation. As Everybody Carpe Diem ?

    Man’s multi-dimensional calculus would be doomed into Machine’s just 0+1=1+1=0 only. Or shall I use the term equalized in the place of doomed? Or the even more permissive term surrendered?